Alexander Sørloth’s “Elite” Skill Set Is Overrated

Table of Contents

 

Alexander Sørloth burst onto the scene as a towering, modern-day Norse forward—tall, strong, and blessed with a left foot that seemed custom-made for striking from all angles. After a stunning 23-goal season that nearly secured La Liga’s Pichichi award, he earned a move to Atlético Madrid, prompting pundits to hail him as one of Europe’s most complete strikers. Yet beneath the hype lies an inconvenient truth: many of Sørloth’s most-touted “elite” skills are, in reality, one-dimensional or situational. This article challenges the prevailing narrative, drawing on match data, expert commentary, and performance analysis to ask if Norway’s leading goalscorer truly deserves his vaunted reputation—or if his strengths have been magnified by a season-long purple patch.

1. Finishing: Clinical or a One-Season Wonder?

Sørloth’s goal-scoring feats—17 goals in one La Liga campaign—sparked comparisons to elite marksmen. However, underlying metrics suggest his finishing prowess may not be as sustainable as it appears.

• Overperformance on xG: According to Breaking The Lines, Sørloth’s actual goals exceeded his expected goals (xG) significantly, indicating a degree of over-performance that often evens out in subsequent seasons.

• Reliance on High-Percentage Chances: Many of his goals came from close-range tap-ins or one-on-ones—situations less reliant on pure technique and more on positioning and luck. While a striker must be opportunistic, true elite finishers convert from a broader range of scenarios.

In short, Sørloth’s finishing streak may reflect an outlier season rather than a repeatable elite skill set.

2. Hold-Up Play: Strength Over Substance

At 1.95 m and with a nearly 95 cm vertical leap, Sørloth excels in aerial duels, winning nearly five per 90 minutes—comparable to Álvaro Morata under Simeone. His physicality allows him to shield the ball and flick it on, but this dimension of his game masks deeper limitations.

• Limited Ball Progression: Match analyses note that Sørloth often simply lays the ball off rather than driving play forward. He attempts fewer than three dribbles per 90 minutes, compared to more dynamic forwards like Ángel Correa (though Correa plays a different role).

• Predictable Patterns: Defenders quickly learned to crowd him, knowing that his primary options were header flicks or knock-downs to nearby runners—hardly the hallmark of a versatile target man.

Thus, while his bullion-barrel frame can impose on defenders, his hold-up play lacks the technical nuance to truly unlock defences on its own.

3. Dribbling and Link-Up: Improved but Inconsistent

Early critiques painted Sørloth as a limited ball-carrier. Recent spells in La Liga showed improvement—he can now operate in tight spaces and complete nearly three dribbles per match. Yet, this facet remains sporadic.

• Situational Dribbles: His dribbling is most effective in transitions behind the back line, not in congested central areas. When Atlético Madrid’s midfield pressed, Sørloth seldom drifted deep to receive and turn—unlike more complete strikers who drop in to link play.

• Assist Deficit: Despite a high assist rate relative to expected assists (xA), his actual chance creation is low; he averages the fewest passes per 90 minutes among Atlético’s forwards, underscoring limited involvement in build-up.

In essence, dribbling is no longer his Achilles’ heel, but it remains far from a reliably “elite” weapon in all phases of play.

4. Positional Intelligence: Streaky, Not Savvy

Scouts praise Sørloth’s knack for timing runs behind defenders. Indeed, when served line-breaking passes, he is “difficult to stop”. Nonetheless, his overall off-ball movement raises questions.

• Infrequent Involvement: There are too many games where he “disappears” without regular service, suggesting his movement lacks the subtlety to create space or demand the ball constantly.

• One-Dimensional Runs: His runs tend to be vertical sprints into space rather than deceptive diagonal movements or dropping off to draw defenders—a key trait of top-level forwards.

Thus, his positional game can exploit a single tactical scenario, but it struggles when teams adapt or mark him more tightly.

5. Aerial Dominance: Genuine Strength, Limited Impact

There’s no disputing Sørloth’s aerial ability: his heading and jumping ratings (90+ in game models) reflect dominance in the air. Yet, football has evolved beyond static crosses into the box.

• Declining Cross Frequency: Modern La Liga defences concede fewer aerial duels because teams emphasize low crosses and intricate passing. Sørloth’s primary asset—in-the-air goals—is therefore less potent than in past eras.

• Limited Secondary Contribution: Winning aerial duels is valuable, but converting them into goal-creating situations requires immediate link-up or flicks into space—areas where his quick distribution is often found wanting.

In short, his aerial edge shines only in specific match contexts and doesn’t guarantee match-winning returns week in, week out.

6. Work-Rate and Defensive Contribution: A Mixed Bag

Under Diego Simeone, Atlético Madrid’s forwards are expected to press aggressively. Sørloth’s record here is uneven.

• Selective Pressing: He often lets a teammate initiate the press before joining, rather than leading from the front. Compare this to Antoine Griezmann’s relentless work-rate, and Sørloth’s efforts can appear half-hearted.

• Defensive Metrics: His tackles and interceptions per 90 minutes are modest (around 0.5 combined), lagging behind more defensively disciplined forwards in the league.

While he does contribute occasionally, his defensive impact is far from the hallmark of a complete all-round striker.

7. Injury Record and Physical Durability

Sørloth has largely stayed fit, but a thigh problem sidelined him for several matches last season—a reminder of his frame’s vulnerability.

• Injury Risk: Tall, heavy players often face recurring muscle strains when asked to sprint repeatedly. Sørloth’s model is no exception, raising questions about his availability over a long campaign.

• Recovery and Form: Extended layoffs can disrupt form and confidence, crucial for a striker whose game relies on sharp timing and rhythm.

Health concerns may be a minor caveat now but could intensify under a grueling European schedule.

8. Mental Resilience and Adaptability

Many hailed Sørloth’s man-management success under Simeone—transforming a big-money signing into a reliable “super-sub”. Yet this role shift underscores deeper issues.

• Psychological Toll: Moving from starter to impact substitute requires significant mental adjustment. While he has embraced it admirably, it also signals coaching staff’s hesitancy to trust him as a 90-minute option.

• Tactical Fit: His strengths align with one dimension of Atlético’s system—late runs into space when opponents tire. As Simeone’s tactics evolve, Sørloth must prove he can excel in varied roles, not just as a bench-bolt.

His current effectiveness may partly reflect novelty; true adaptability will be tested if he moves again or Atlético changes style.

9. International Stage: Translatable Performance?

On the Norway national team, Sørloth’s record is solid but not spectacular (8 goals in 23 appearances). His synergy with teammates like Erling Haaland is limited by differing styles.

• Different Dynamics: Haaland thrives in a central high-volume system; Sørloth’s more circumscribed role yields fewer chances. This raises doubts whether his club form can translate consistently to the international arena.

• Pressure Situations: Big tournaments demand strikers who can produce in varied contexts and systems. So far, Sørloth’s national team contributions suggest he remains a useful option but not a game-changer.

To cement his status, he must deliver more varied and decisive performances in Norway’s major qualifiers and championship outings.

10. The Hype Cycle: Patience or Overvaluation?

Sørloth’s meteoric rise—from RB Groningen to La Liga standout—fueled lofty expectations. Yet history warns of “one-season wonders.”

• Peak vs. Plateau: Strikers who over-outperform their underlying numbers often regress. Watch for signs that his finishing bell-curve normalizes, as happened with many in-form forwards before him.

• Market Pressures: Media and fan adulation can inflate a player’s perceived value, sometimes leading to transfers that misalign with tactical needs, as seen in his mixed loan spell at AC Milan.

Patience is vital. Celebrating a breakthrough season is one thing; heralding him as an elite all-round talent may be premature.

Conclusion

Alexander Sørloth embodies many traits of the modern center-forward: size, aerial prowess, and an eye for goal. Yet, when we strip away the statistical outliers and tactical conveniences, much of his vaunted skill set proves narrow or situational. His finishing spike may regress, hold-up play lacks finesse, link-up is inconsistent, and his all-round contributions fall short of truly elite standards.

For Norwegian fans—proud of their countryman’s exploits—this critique is no dismissal of talent, but a call for measured expectations. Recognize Sørloth’s genuine strengths, yet remain alert to the limits of a one-season purple patch. Only then can we appreciate Alexander Sørloth for what he is: a potentially very good striker, rather than the next generation’s archetypal “complete forward.”